Starting points for senior leaders, teachers, technical staff, and e-learning leaders to consider when using digital devices for learning.
The primary goal of using digital devices is to improve learner outcomes.
Digital devices provide:
These contribute to building digital fluency, increased student engagement, motivation, independence, task completion, and efficiency.
Eight-in-ten principals report that digital technologies are having a positive impact on student achievement.
Pakuranga College principal Michael Williams explains, “the type of learning students are doing is changing”. They are more authentic and aligned to the real world. Learning has become much more collaborative and students are more engaged.
Dr. David Parsons, Associate Professor of Information Technology at Massey University explains the digital divide is not only about access but about how devices are used.
Principal Melissa Bell describes St Hilda's school vision and how it is supported and enabled by technology. Enabling students to learn anywhere at any time and to work collaboratively both locally and globally improves learner outcomes. Involving parents in students’ learning has also been an important factor.
The number of devices available to students affects how, where, and when they are used.
Shared devices – Devices are provided by the school, giving students access to technology in the classroom. In classrooms with shared devices teachers need to plan learning activities that allow equitable access by students, such as:
1:1 devices – All students can access a device whenever they need to. Devices may be supplied by the school or purchased by students.
Wairakei School principal Shane Buckner discusses why the school adopted a BYOD approach to enable their children to become connected, capable learners, using 1:1 devices to personalise learning.
Funding digital devices requires a sustained investment that goes beyond the devices alone. People’s time is likely to be a significant investment too.
Funding and time may be needed for:
Your school can choose to fund devices, ask that students bring their own device (BYOD) to school or do a mixture of both. The Ministry does not allow schools to use operational funding to subsidise the cost of devices that students will keep.
A good retailer or reseller should provide useful advice and guidance about device procurement options that meet your needs. Ask if they provide services to get the technology properly set up.
Most principals were confident that their teachers were developing effective pedagogies using digital technologies to enhance learning, though around a third did not think they had adequate resources to support good quality learning with these, or that all or almost all their students had good access to digital technologies at home.
Initial capital investment may be able to be funded from savings, charitable grants, community fundraising, parent contributions, partnerships, or top-up grants under your school property plan.
There is an attractive up-front cost-saving to purchasing second-hand. But, you may need to:
With donations you should consider:
Schools can save time, effort, and money by making use of all-of-government procurement processes for digital devices. The government uses the power of collective purchasing to secure good deals.
All New Zealand Schools are eligible to join the All of Government (AoG) purchasing scheme. Schools are encouraged to consider the AoG scheme because suppliers are contractually obliged to ensure that their products are not available at a cheaper price through any other channel.
Leasing devices means that a finance company pays for them then you pay off that cost over a number of years.
The two big advantages of leasing are that:
The total cost of leasing is typically higher than purchasing outright as you are only paying for the devices themselves and not the finance or administrative costs of the finance company. At the end of the lease period, you either keep the devices, send them back, or pay extra money to keep them, depending on the type of lease that has been arranged. Unlike leasing cars or photocopiers, leasing digital devices does not typically provide any protection against theft, malfunction, damage, and so on – you will still need to consider insurance and warranties.
The Department of Internal Affairs keeps an index of Societies that Make Grants , which you can apply to for funding the purchase of devices.
Some schools ask students to bring their own digital devices (BYOD). The two options are:
Some schools partner with parents to purchase specified devices using a payment plan.
Not all families can afford to buy a digital device for their child. The Education Act 1989 gives all students in Aotearoa New Zealand the right to a free education. This means that students can’t be denied access to learning opportunities because they do not have the recommended equipment.
Equity issues can be addressed by schools providing a number of devices for students to use for the day issued by the library, or by setting up a lease-to-own arrangement for students. For example, families within the Manaiakalani Schools (a community of collaborating schools) can choose to pay $3.50 per week over three years to purchase the device their child is using.
Ben Britton, e-Learning leader at Wellington High School, and students describe the impact of having their own digital device on learning, student agency, and collaboration.
Some school communities are working in partnerships that use a separate legal entity, such as a trust, to fund or lease digital devices and online learning resources. The partnership may source funding and bulk-buying discounts to provide families with more affordable devices and support. Parents can contribute an ongoing sum to pay for the device and/or internet connection at home.
Under the Crown Entities Act and Education Act, school boards can only enter into certain types of securities. The two main types of securities are:
A debt security is a right to be paid money that has been lent to someone else. Schools can only acquire debt securities through other approved New Zealand financial institutions and public securities. This means schools cannot lend money to the school community or establish a school-run device hire purchase scheme.
Introducing BYOD and 1:1 digital devices requires extensive planning, communication, and ongoing evaluation. It’s important to involve students, teachers, and the wider school community throughout the process, responding to people's needs at each stage.
Some schools implementing BYOD and 1:1 devices choose to work together to support each other and share resources.
BYOD checklist.pdf (PDF, 122.53 kB)
This BYOD and 1:1 preparedness checklist provides an overview of planning and implementation steps related to:
e-Learning lead teacher, John O’Regan describes the important considerations for Hampden Street School to create reliable systems that meet the needs of their BYOD programme.
The use of 1:1 devices needs to align with your school’s vision and strategic goals. It’s important to have an e-learning strategy in place before you start planning your 1:1 devices strategy.
An e-learning strategy needs to be in place before you start planning your 1:1 devices strategy.
Once your e-learning strategy is understood and supported by the school community, you’re ready to start planning for 1:1 devices.
1:1 programmes only succeed if teachers are willing and able to change their practice. To do this, teachers need to understand the why of 1:1 devices as well as how to use them effectively.
In this video, educational consultant, Julia Atkin discusses the process of leading e-learning in a school. She explains the importance of creating a shared vision, that reflects the competencies students need to develop, and the importance of identifying the learning needs of staff to ensure the vision can be realised. Although the focus of the video is on e-learning in a more general sense, the content is entirely applicable to the process of implementing 1:1 devices.
Support teachers to explore ways that using 1:1 devices can develop confident, capable, lifelong learners:
The principal of Mahurangi Christian School talks about the shift from a teacher-centred approach to a student-centred approach supported by 1:1 iPads.
Before introducing 1:1 devices, parents and caregivers need multiple opportunities to contribute, raise questions, and build their understanding of how 1:1 devices will be used at school and at home.
Parents want to know that adding more technology into their children’s lives is going to have some kind of tangible, positive impact on learning. Explain how using 1:1 devices enables students to:
Being able to answer parents' questions helps them understand your school’s rationale for introducing 1:1 devices.
Moving towards 1:1 devices requires a commitment from the whole school community, including families and whānau. A vital part of the process is ensuring that staff, students, and whānau have a shared understanding about the benefits of 1:1 devices.
In your communications with parents, demonstrate examples of using 1:1 digital devices, along with good teacher practice, showing improved engagement and learning outcomes. Begin by using school stories and examples from the [school stories]. Over time, you can create your own similar stories to share.
Holy Cross School is a very multicultural community. Kathy Moy-Low explains how the staff have consulted with, and engaged, the parent community in e-learning. One of their initiatives is after-school parent technology sessions, which are run once a month. In this video clip, parents explain how their own confidence with technology has grown and their engagement with their children’s learning has increased.
Initial engagements with parents and whānau may include discussions about:
When the initial consultation is completed and analysed, plan how you will:
Parents from Wairakei School describe the benefits of their children being in a BYOD class including increased motivation, improvements to learning, and greater independence. Parents value being able to better support their children and see their progress more readily.
Michael Williams, principal of Pakuranga College, shares the importance of being able to articulate why you are using digital devices, and how they improve teaching and learning. He also explains the usefulness of a staged approach to 1:1 devices, learning from pilot groups while working towards school-wide implementation.
Choosing which device(s) students will be using involves having a clear understanding of how teachers and students will use them, including differences across year groups and subject areas.
As you investigate device recommendations for students consider:
Principal, Michael Williams, and deputy principal, Billy Merchant from Pakuranga College, explain their change in pedagogy from telling students which device to purchase to providing some device specifications and allowing students to choose the device that best meets their needs. Billy says that since they've gone device agnostic, "we’ve seen greater creativity in our classroom than what we would have seen if we’d stuck with one platform, one device, one app".
Deputy principal, Dominic Killalea, discusses why Wellington High School encouraged students to bring the device they use at home to school. The school has a minimum set of specifications for purchasing a device, which are updated annually.
Identify the pros and cons of different devices by:
As well as a supportive infrastructure and digital devices, teacher expertise, confidence, and enthusiasm all play an important role in the successful use of 1:1 devices. With rapid technological changes and an ever-developing range of resources and applications, teachers need many and varied opportunities to develop their e-learning capabilities.
e-Learning coordinator, Allistair Williamson, explains the processes a school used to support the successful use of BYOD in the classroom, including professional development of staff.
Teachers can receive professional development through:
The e-Learning Planning Framework helps teachers to reflect on and evaluate their e-learning capabilities. The eLPF supports regular self-review and subsequent improvement of e-learning skills and knowledge in ways that reflect our bicultural heritage within a multicultural context.
The framework provides schools and teachers with:
Dominic Killalea, DP Wellington High School, describes their professional development model for supporting teachers.
The Virtual Learning Network (VLN) is an online professional learning community for New Zealand teachers and school leaders to discuss and share their practice. The Enabling e-Learning community has several sub-groups that support teachers to use digital devices to enhance learning. Useful groups include:
Setting up a small-scale trial or pilot of BYOD can be a valuable way to determine your school’s readiness to embark on a wider initiative.
Wairakei School trialed BYOD with a Year 5/6 class in 2014. The trial was focused on developing a Universal Design for Learning (UDL) approach supported by digital technologies. By creating an inclusive classroom environment with personalised learning to cater for all students, including those with special learning needs and ensuring the learning programme was successful for them, the needs of all students were met.
Prior to beginning the trial e-learning leader, Kate Friedwald and principal, Shane Buckner:
Wairakei School principal, Shane Buckner discusses why the school adopted a BYOD approach to enable their children to become connected, capable learners, using one-to-one devices to personalise learning.
Wairakei School's process for setting up and carrying out the trial is described in this series of videos.
Evidence gathered at the conclusion of the trial showed that all the students felt that:
Like any teaching and learning programme, the success of students having 1:1 access to devices needs to be regularly evaluated.
Key questions to ask:
The Substitution Augmentation Modification Redefinition (SAMR) model is a framework that teachers can use to assess and evaluate how they are using 1:1 devices and specific software applications in their classrooms.
Developed by Dr Ruben Puentedura, the model shows a progression that adopters of educational technology often follow as they progress through different stages of teaching and learning with technology.
As teachers move along the continuum, computer technology becomes more important in the classroom but at the same time becomes more invisibly woven into the demands of good teaching and learning.
Ben Britton, lead teacher ICT at Wellington High School, discusses how teachers use the SAMR model to evaluate and plan for effective use of technologies in the classroom. He explains the process of trial and error that they went through and how they experimented with the SAMR model to find what worked best for them.
Teacher inquiry – SAMR provides more information and examples of ways that teachers are using the SAMR model.
Using 1:1 devices opens up worlds of possibilities in terms of new learning experiences, but it also presents challenges in terms of safety, health, and wellbeing.
Policies and acceptable use agreements, along with conversations about online safety, help students to develop the strategies and awareness they need to keep themselves and others safe in online spaces.
Sean Lyons, Development Manager from NetSafe, discusses the concept of digital citizenship and how it fits into the National Curriculum. He explains that the focus of cyber-safety has expanded beyond policies and procedures to include discussion, action, and teachable moments in the classroom. Students need to build skills and knowledge to effectively manage cyber challenges themselves to become confident and successful digital citizens.
The NetSafe Kit for Schools is a comprehensive set of tools and resources that help schools and educators create and manage a safe online environment. All of the resources in the kit are free for schools.
“Most schools have strategies in place to deal with the most obvious risks of cyberbullying and access to inappropriate content, but the risks to students’ physical health may be overlooked because the effects are less immediate”
Straighten Up , an article from the Australian Council for Educational Research
Children are susceptible to physical disorders as a result of poor use of devices. The biggest problems are:
These are caused by poor lighting, poor seating, and inefficient setup of keyboard, mouse, and computer.
While the size of the screen is important when thinking about eye strain, the lighting in the room or the type of screen is more important. Excessively bright light either from sunlight coming in through a window or from harsh interior lighting will impact how the user can see the screen and then their eyes. Ambient lighting should be about half as bright as that typically found in most offices.
You can alleviate these effects by:
Computer keyboards and mice are potential vehicles for the transmission of bacteria. Shared computers, such as those used in classrooms are readily contaminated by many common bacteria. Cleaning and hand hygiene are useful to reduce the risk of cross-contamination.
Giving students flexibility of space is an important part of today’s learning environments. The types of furniture available for children to use when they are working on their devices is, therefore, an important consideration. Provide a variety of sizes of ergonomic chairs and variable-height work surfaces to enable all students to sit at the right height and distance from the computer.
Computer accessories such as mice if used incorrectly, or in the incorrect size for small hands, can cause injury. There are a number of assistive positioning options to meet specific needs such as mounting arms for tablets and slope desks for laptops.
It is important to design activities so children get an opportunity to change posture regularly. Ensure they are not using a device for long periods of time.
Suggestions to support good habits
Patterns of posture begin around the age of seven so learning about posture and safe use of digital devices should be embedded into your programmes.
There are an ever-increasing number of digital devices to choose from. Your decisions will impact how effectively the devices get used to meet your school’s vision for learning with digital technology.
Getting value for money within the available budget is always a key consideration. Be wary of cutting costs and taking the lowest-priced option. Lower-priced devices can perform poorly, and be less robust and reliable.
Staff at St Hilda's Collegiate explain the process they went through to select the 1:1 device they are currently using. This involved:
If devices are to be used in different places, then weight and screen size are important, especially if devices are being carried to and from school.
There are a few key operating systems that run on devices. Choosing a device goes hand-in-hand with choosing an operating system:
Additional new devices may need particular infrastructure such as expanded wifi or additional cabling.
What technical systems, expertise, and time are required to get the devices up and running and to make changes later on? How are the devices configured to provide personal experiences for end-users with specific settings and software/apps in place?
Investigate the range available to use with the device. Will the device run what you need it to?
Consider what you require in addition to what the devices come with such as covers to protect a tablet from damage or wireless mice for laptops. Will you be using the device to connect things like programmable circuit boards (like Raspberry Pi’s, Arduinos, or MicroBits), digital microscopes, robotics, 3D printers, and so on? How can the device be connected to your school’s projectors or TVs?
How will you manage charging devices? Is the power adapter and cable universal or proprietary?
A very low-priced device is likely to be underspecified in terms of performance, battery life, touch screen performance, camera, storage, Wi-Fi capability, reliability, robustness, and so on. Determine the minimum level of quality and specification you will accept – don’t choose on low price alone.
Will the devices support students with particular learning needs? Common accessibility options such as magnification, colour schemes, and text-to-speech are now available on all the main operating systems but different devices have different capabilities and each has strengths and weaknesses. Accessibility options are outlined by Apple , Microsoft and Google for each of their products. Schools and/or individual students should consider the accessibility options available in each device and select the device that is most appropriate for them. Consider also any software which may need to be loaded or enabled on devices to support learning such as text-to-speech, captioning, and voice command.
What options are there for future expansion such as to the devices’ memory or storage? With files increasingly being stored in the cloud, storage may not be a key concern but you should consider how much will be required as it tends to be costly and inconvenient to upgrade later.
How available and expensive are replacement parts such as screens or keyboards and consumables such as batteries?
What other products and software does the school already use that need to integrate with the devices? The rapid and increasingly important move towards cloud connectivity means that this is likely to be a key factor in your choice of devices. The biggest players in the device market are also the biggest players in the cloud platforms Google, Apple, and Microsoft. Each vendor’s cloud tools work best on their own platforms. If you are considering using multiple devices you may need to consider, for example, how well Google’s G Suite works on an iPad or whether Office 365 works well enough on a Chromebook. While there is likely to be some level of compatibility between systems, there are also likely to be some compromises. Although compatibility between devices/platforms is improving all the time, the only sure-fire way to determine it is to get hands-on and do some trials.
An issue particular to schools is that a device could be used by many different people during the day. It tends to be easier if the experience is particular to the person logged, for example, they can get their email, files, apps, settings, passwords, shortcuts, and so on. Generic user set-ups tend to be a little more limited because the environment is not configured optimally for the particular needs of each individual.
What is available for the specific device and its ecosystems in the education community? What are the likely professional development requirements?
This might come as standard for some devices, or be available at an increased price for others. Consider the benefits that a touch interface will bring against the additional cost. There is increasing research about the importance of "inking" in learning, such as students’ ability to write directly onto their devices or to annotate notes and diagrams. For any screens that are touched, think about how to keep them clean. For styluses, think about how to ensure they are not lost along with potential replacement costs if they are.
Consider the capability and ease of use of capturing photos, taking videos, and recording sound. Not all cameras and microphones are created equal. If high-quality outcome is important then the device needs to be of a sufficiently high specification. Some devices lend themselves better than others for editing multimedia once it has been captured.
How effective is the device if an internet connection is not available?
Tablets are light, mobile, tactile, and relatively simple to use for all age groups and have excellent multimedia options. The simple interface and available apps tend to make tablets particularly suitable for junior students but they can be versatile enough, particularly if used with a separate keyboard, for senior students. A simple stylus can be used to write or draw on tablets but Bluetooth styluses are increasing in popularity to give more precise writing and drawing capabilities. Tablets tend to be robust as they have no moving parts but their screens can be broken so some kind of protective cover is recommended.
Tablets are a good choice if you'd like:
Laptops have the benefit of an integrated keyboard that tablets lack. Their portability means that they can be used in different environments within the school but if people are carrying them to and from school weight should be a purchase consideration as they can be heavy.
Laptops are a good choice if:
The full keyboard and larger screen size of desktops are more conducive to extended tasks and to students being able to work together around them. They are usually plugged directly into the power so battery life is not an issue and they can work with a cabled connection rather than being reliant on Wifi so network-intensive tasks like transferring large files can be faster. Desktops tend to last longer than other devices because they don’t experience the wear and tear of being moved around, have fewer moving parts and it is easier to keep their internal electronic components cooler. For the same price, a desktop is likely to have a higher performance than a tablet or laptop.
Desktops are a good choice if you:
Hybrids attempt to combine the best of both worlds, giving users the mobility and touch interface of a tablet as well as the productivity of a laptop.
Choosing a hybrid will add weight and more moving or connecting parts to go wrong but could be a good choice to make your devices more versatile, particularly to make it easier to capture photos and videos.
Finding safe and secure ways to store digital devices can be challenging, especially when space is already an issue.
Systems manager, Alistair Montgomery describes St Hilda's management to ensure students can keep working on their laptops all day, relying on the battery. Charging stations are monitored with security cameras. Built-in chargers are being developed for students to use to enable them to keep working if necessary.
Groups of teachers share how they manage device storage in these VLN discussions.
Systems manager, Alistair Montgomerie, describes the infrastructure set up at St Hildas to enable all students and staff to use the Internet as part of their 1-1 laptops programme.
Systems manager, Alistair Montgomery describes St Hilda's management to ensure students can keep working on their laptops all day, relying on the battery.
St Hilda's Collegiate teacher, Donna Smith describes how the 1-1 laptop programme, along with using e-portfolios, gives her flexibility to be more responsive to the learning needs of the students, and enhances her ability to support student learning.
St Hilda's College staff explain the process they went through to select MacBook Pros as the 1-1 device they are currently using.
Principal Melissa Bell and the e-learning leaders at St Hilda's Collegiate describe the professional development they have in place to support teachers with teaching and learning.
Principal Melissa Bell describes St Hilda's school vision and how it is supported and enabled by technology.
Hingaia Penninsula School principal, Jane Danielson shares planning their technological infrastructure.
Mark Quigley, Deputy Principal, and Tony Zaloum, Director ICT Projects, explain their vision for e-learning as they embark on implementing BYOD for Year 9 students at Orewa College.
Dr. David Parsons, Associate Professor Information Technology at Massey University explains the digital divide is not only about access but about how devices are used.
Tyler, a year 6 student with dyspraxia, uses a netbook to help him write creatively instead of being inhibited by the speed of his handwriting or his ability to form letters.
Using a netbook, Google docs, and blogging has increased engagement and improved learning outcomes for student Kieren.
Implementing 1-1 netbooks has enabled personalised learning to meet the needs of all students in the senior classes at Parkvale school and provided opportunities for success.
Teacher and e-learning leader, Kate Friedwald explains the information provided for parents at Wairakei School to introduce a BYOD trial for Year 5/6 students in 2014.
Kate Friedwald describes step-by-step the process she went through from researching BYOD to setting up a classroom learning programme using BYOD at Wairakei School.
Principal, Shane Buckner and e-learning leader, Kate Friedwald, talk about the systems and setup they have at Wairakei School to successfully use 1-1 devices.
Parents from Wairakei School describe the benefits that being in a BYOD class has had for their children.
e-Learning co-ordinator, Allistair Williamson explains key steps for implementing BYOD at Pakuranga College.
Michael Williams, principal Pakuranga College, discusses some of the key questions they worked through when developing their digital strategy.
Ben Britton, lead teacher ICT at Wellington High School, discusses how they use the SAMR model to evaluate plan for effective use of technologies in the classroom.
Dominic Killalea, Deputy Principal at Wellington High School, discusses some key infrastructure considerations to ensure good connectivity across your school.
Dominic Killalea, Deputy Principal at Wellington High School, discusses their key considerations for selecting devices for students.
Dominic Killalea, Deputy Principal at Wellington High School, discusses the importance of making time for professional learning.
Lead ICT teacher, Ben Britton and students at Wellington High School describe how 1:1 devices have enabled student agency.
Wellington High School teacher, Ben Britton describes the differences and opportunities to planning and teaching as a result of using online resources and students bringing their own devices.
Pakuranga College principal Michael Williams explains, learning has become more collaborative and students are more engaged.
Students from Pakuranga College, along with their deputy principal, Billy Merchant, share how using their digital devices to access online resources supports their learning.
The principal and deputy principal of Pakuranga College talk about planning for successful implementation of BYOD across the school.
Pakuranga College deputy principal, Billy Merchant explains their ongoing community consultation process, which includes how and why students devices, and digital citizenship.
Michael Williams and Billy Merchant from Pakuranga College, explain their change in pedagogy from telling students which device to purchase to being "device agnostic".
Wellington High School Principal, Dominic Killalea explains the pedagogy behind their BYOD approach which supports lifelong learning.
Sorry, no items found.
This section contains the e-Learning Planning Framework (eLPF) along with supporting information and resources.
Microsoft education design and deployment guide : A framework for change
21 Steps to 21st Century learning – 1:1 planning and implementation framework from the Anywhere Anytime Learning Foundation (AALF)
K-12 Blueprint: A planning resource for personalising learning – Information from Intel on planning, launching, leading, and sustaining a 1:1 or BYOD programme
This OECD report covers the available evidence on innovation in education, the impact of digital technologies on teaching and learning, and the role of digital skills and the education industries in the process of innovation, using data from OECD surveys.
An Education week article summarising a meta-analysis of 1-to-1 computing programs conducted by Michigan State University researchers. A key finding was, 1-to-1 laptop programs had a statistically significant positive impact on student test scores in English/language arts, writing, math, and science.
This OECD report discusses differences in access to, and use of, ICTs related to students’ socio-economic status, gender, geographic location, and the school a child attends. The report highlights the importance of bolstering students’ ability to navigate through digital texts. It also examines the relationship between computer access in schools, computer use in classrooms, and performance in the PISA assessment. All students first need to be equipped with basic literacy and numeracy skills so that they can participate fully in the connected, digitised 21st-century societies.